khi--si~!!!

ROC the-che e toa-hak-chia tosi chitkhoan iuN-siuN!!!

~Tekhoa

>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: æ´ªæä» 
> Sent: Friday, March 14, 2003 11:53 AM
> Subject: FW: å¾µæ±é£ç½²
>
>
> >
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: æ´ªæä»
> > Sent: Friday, March 14, 2003 11:52 AM
> > To: 'YH KUO'
> > Subject: RE: å¾µæ±é£ç½²
> >
> >
> > Unsuan
> >
> > è¬è¬å¦³é å¨è±åå°åå
§èªè¨åé¡çéå¿ï¼å¯¦å¨ä»¤äººæåã
> >
> > æè©¢æ¬è¦å¦ä¸ï¼
> >
> > 1)æè²é¨å·²æ¼1999å¹´1æ19æ¥å
¬åé©åèªé³æ¨æ¹æ¡(ä¿ç¨±TLPA)
> > When has it been announced and where? Newspaper? Which one? Many
> > newspaper? Official?
> > 以ä¸å·²ç¶ä¿®æ¹çº1998/1/12ãè«é²æ¬æ網ç«ï¼
> > [http://www.tlls.org.tw](<http://www.tlls.org.tw/>)
> > ä¸è¼åå§æªæ¡ã
> >
> > 2)å
¶æç¢ççç²¾ç¥ä¸èéé¢ä¸çæ失å°å¯ç³è«å家賠
> > åï¼è主æ¿çæè²é¨é·ãåèªæ¨è¡å§å¡æ主任å§å¡äº¦æè² èµ·ç¸ç¶çæ¿æ²»è²¬
> > ä»»ã
> > Do we have any laws supporting this?
> > å家賠åæ³ç¬¬ä¸æ¢(<http://www.wra.gov.tw/law/z52-frame.htm>)è¦å®ï¼
> > ãæå
o͘å
±è¨­æ½å è¨­ç½®æ管çæä¹
缺ï¼è´äººæ°çå½ã身é«æ財ç¢åæ害è
ï¼å家æè² 
æ
> 害
> > è³ å責任ãã
> > èæè²é¨æçºè³ åæ©éã
> >
> > 3)æéä»»ç¨å¿è
¹ï¼æé¤ç°å·±ï¼
> > Do we have evidence?
> > ç¶ç¶æï¼å±å¤äººç¶ç¶ä¸äºè§£ï¼ä¸ä¿¡è«åä»»ä½ä¸åå
§è¡äººã
> > 詳細åèå§åæå¾ç½ªäººï¼è«ä¸è¦åæï¼å»ååèªæå§å¡å§ã
> >
> > 4)"äºå¯¦ä¸TLPAèªå
¬å以ä¾å»£å人æ°çæ­¡è¿ï¼ç®åä¹åºçå90%以ä¸é½æ¡ç¨
> > TLPAæ¨é³ï¼ä¸¦æªç¼çä»»ä½ä¸ä¾¿ä¹èã"
> > Do we have evidence? Questionnaires?
> > ç§å­¸ç調æ¥éæ²æãä½æ¯å
§è¡äººé½ç¥éã
> > å
æ¯éå®åºç社ç課æ¬å°±æ70%e̍sharea̍
> > 摨瑁餌隤脫砌寞10%+e̍sharea̍
> > å
¶ä»ççæ¬é½å¾®ä¸è¶³éã
> > ????nevidence????i????H??????
> >
> > 5)TLPAæ¯ç±å°ç£èªæå­¸æçå­¸è
ååæè²é¨æèè«çå°å®¶å­¸è
ï¼æ¶éææçæ¼é³æ¹
> æ¡ï¼
> > æ ¹æå°æ¥­çè¨è«ãæ°ä¸»ç決å®ï¼éæ廣çæå¶å®ï¼ä¸¦éééé è»ã
> > What kind of survey are we talking about? Can we draft out one
> > proposal to evaluate TLPA? Surely, we know the advantages and
> > disadvantages of TLPA?
> > è«é²æ¬æ網ç«ï¼
> > [http://www.tlls.org.tw](<http://www.tlls.org.tw/>)
> > åèæå­¸è³æºé¨åï¼å°¤å
¶è£å¿ å¸ãå°ç£èªé³é³æ¨æ¹æ¡çæ¬è­°èå®æãä¸æ(ä¸è¼ä¸­)
> >
> > 6)éåæ¹æ¡ä¸ä¸å®æ²æ缺é»ï¼ä¹ä¸ä¸å®ä¸è½ä¿®æ­£ï¼ä½ç¡è«å¦ä½ï¼æåå 
決
> > èªçºåèªææä½ä»»ä½ä¿®æ¹ï¼å¿
é æåºå­¸è¡ä¸ççç±ï¼æ¯å¦ç¶éå¯ä¿¡çèªè¨
> > å­¸ç調æ¥è­æTLPAç缺失ï¼æç±é³é»å­¸å®¶ç¶éå°æ¥­çè¨è«æåºé³é»å­¸ä¸ç
> > çè«æ ¹æï¼æ ¹æ缺é»é²è¡ä¿®æ¹ï¼ç¶å°æ¥­çç ç©¶èè¨è«æ±ºå®ä¿®æ¹ã
> > What kind of survey are we talking about? Can we draft out one
> > proposal to evaluate TLPA? Surely, we know the advantages and
> > disadvantages of TLPA?
> > æèªçºæ該æä¸å調æ¥ï¼èª¿æ¥ï¼
> > 1 ç®åçå°èªåºçæ
å½¢ï¼ä½¿ç¨é³æ¨ç種é¡åå
¶ä½æçãå­è¾­å
¸ãæå­¸æåä½ååºç
æ

> > å½¢ã網路å³è¼¸çææç­ã
> > 2 ååé³æ¨ä½¿ç¨çææ³ï¼å¨æå­¸ã使ç¨ä¸ææ²æä»éº¼åªç¼ºé» (éç¶ç¾å¨ç使ç¨è
ā»
e̍¶
> 使
> > ç¨ç深度è廣度é½å¾å°ï¼
> > 實éä¸ç¡æ³è¨è«ä»éº¼åªç¼ºé»ï¼ä½æ¯å¯ä»¥ååè)ã
> >
> >
> > 7) åå è
æ以ç¶å設è¨æ­¤ä¸æ¹æ¡ä¹å°ç£èªæå­¸æåç¶å¹´æè²é¨æèè«çå°
> > 家學è
åTLPAç使ç¨åé«çºä¸»ï¼èéç±æ¿æ²»ä»»å½çå°æ¸åèªå§å¡ææ票決
> > å®åæ¨ã
> > Is it ok to inferring to certain members? (legally?) I feel that
> > an independent survey is needed to investigate this, instead of
> > the old or the new members. In this way, there will be less
> > chance of having disputes and bias.
> > TLPAæ¯å·²ç¶éåå
¬åå¶å®ç系統並ä¸å·²ç¶å»£æ³å¨ä½¿ç¨ä¸­ã
> > ç®åçåé¡æ¯
> > a éå系統ä¸è½æ¨ç¿»ï¼ä½å¯ä»¥ä¿®æ¹ãä¿®æ¹ä¹ä¸è½å¤§ä¿®ï¼åªè½å°ä¿®ï¼å¦åå°±ä¸å«ä¿®æ¹
āº
> ï¼
> > ï¼TLPAå°æç¾
åªä¿®æ¹7åå°æ¹ï¼å°±å¼èµ·æç¾
æ´¾çåå½äºèªªï¼
> > b å°ç£èªæå­¸ææåå¶å®TLPAæå°±æ¯ä¸æ¹æ²æç¹å®ç«å ´çãå
¬æ­£çèªè¨å­¸å®¶ï¼ä½æ¯
e̍®
> å
> > çåèªæå§å¡æä¸é¨å被ç¹ææ¨é¸åºä¾çå§å¡å°TLPAææµæï¼å
¶ä»ç人大åä¸æ¯é©
å
> èŌ͘
> > çå°å®¶ï¼å°å®¶ä¹ä¸­ä¹åªæå¾å°äººå¯¦éå¨ä½¿ç¨ï¼æ´é«èªªä¾ï¼æ²ææ¢ä»¶è¨è«TLPAé³æ¨ç
好
> > å£ãå¦æåèä¿®æ¹è¨è«ç人å°éå系統ä¸å
§è¡ãæ²æææ
ï¼çè³çæç ´å£å®çç³»
çµ±ï¼
> 製
> > é æ··äºï¼é樣TLPAå°±å®äºãæ以çºäºé²æ­¢ç¡è¬çç­è«èæ¡æçç ´å£ï¼ä¸è½è®ä»åä¾
主
> åⁿ
> > ä¿®æ¹ï¼ä½æåæ²ææé¤ä»ååå ã
> > åå
§éå¿å°ç£è©±ã並ä¸å°æ¼å°ç£è©±æç ç©¶ãæææ
çèªè¨å­¸å®¶æ²æå¹¾ä½ï¼éäºäººå·®
ā¸
> ån̄
> > é½æ¯éå»åèå¶å®TLPAé³æ¨ç人ï¼åå¢å å¹¾åç¶ç¶ä¹æ­¡è¿ï¼ä½å¿
é æ¯çæ­£çå°å®¶å­¸
> è
ï¼
> > çµä¸è½ç±æ¿æ²»ä»»å½çå°æ¸åèªå§å¡ææ票決å®ã
> >
> > 8)æ許å¤äººä¾ä¿¡ææ並é£ç½²ï¼æåçé£ç½²æ¸ä¹å¨ä¿®æ¹ä¸­ãå¦ææè¦ï¼æ¬è«ä¾å½æ
æa̍
> e̍¾
> > å¨å¯ä¸ææ°ççé£ç½²æ¸ã
> > è«ææ­¤å½è½éå°æ¨æèªè­çéå¿å°ç£èªæçåé«æå人ã
> > æåæ­¡è¿é£ç½²ï¼é£ç½²åå®å¤ªé·ç話ï¼æåå¯è½åªåé¨ååé«è² è²¬äººåå®ã
> >
> > è¬è¬ï¼
> >
> > å°ç£èªæå­¸ææé·
> >
> > Ang Uijin
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: YH KUO [[mailto:kuoyh@](<https://web.archive.org/web/20050519222715/mailto:kuoyh@>)...]
> > Sent: Thursday, March 13, 2003 6:38 PM
> > To: æ´ªæä»
> > Subject: Re: å¾µæ±é£ç½²
> >
> >
> > Some clarification needs to be made:
> >
> > 1) "ä¸ãæè²é¨å·²æ¼1999å¹´1æ19æ¥å
¬åé©åèªé³æ¨æ¹æ¡(ä¿ç¨±TLPA)ï¼å
¬ä½
> > 以ä¾å»£åå°å®¶å­¸è
åä¸è¬å°èªæè²å®¶çæ­¡è¿ï¼ä½ä»¥çªç¶å®£ä½è¦éæ°æ¬è¨æ°
> > çæ¹æ¡ï¼æè²é¨ææåçç說æã"
> >
> > When has it been announced and where? Newspaper? Which one? Many
> > newspaper? Official?
> >
> > 2) "ä»»ä½å
o͘å
±æ¿ç­é½æä¸å延çºæ§ï¼æ¿åºå
¬åçæ¼é³æ¹æ¡ï¼ä¸è½å çºå·æ¿
> > è
æ¹è®ï¼ä¾¿å¯ä»¥æ令å¤æ¹ï¼å¦åå®æ³æ¡ç¨TLPAçå­¸è
ãæ師ãåºç社ï¼å 
> > çºæ¿åºçä»»ææ¹è®ï¼å
¶æç¢ççç²¾ç¥ä¸èéé¢ä¸çæ失å°å¯ç³è«å家賠
> > åï¼è主æ¿çæè²é¨é·ãåèªæ¨è¡å§å¡æ主任å§å¡äº¦æè² èµ·ç¸ç¶çæ¿æ²»è²¬
> > ä»»ã"
> >
> > Do we have any laws supporting this?
> >
> > 3) "åèªæ¨è¡å§å¡ææ°ä»»ä¸»å§ç«ä¸ä»»ä¾¿å¤§éä»»ç¨å¿è
¹ï¼æé¤ç°å·±ï¼ä¼å以
> > ä¸æ°ä¸»ãéå­¸è¡æ段ï¼å·å¤©ææ¥ï¼ä»¥ç§è¦æ¨ç¿»å
¬æã"
> >
> > Do we have evidence? If not, better not to say this. It's a
> > personal offence and could lead to some unwanted legal actions.
> >
> > 4) "äºå¯¦ä¸TLPAèªå
¬å以ä¾å»£å人æ°çæ­¡è¿ï¼ç®åä¹åºçå90%以ä¸é½æ¡ç¨
> > TLPAæ¨é³ï¼ä¸¦æªç¼çä»»ä½ä¸ä¾¿ä¹èã"
> >
> > Do we have evidence? Questionnaires?
> >
> > 5) "ä¸ãä»»ä½æ¼é³æ¹æ¡é½ä¸å¯è½æ»¿è¶³ææ人çæå¾
ï¼TLPAæ¯ç±å°ç£èªæå­¸
> > æçå­¸è
ååæè²é¨æèè«çå°å®¶å­¸è
ï¼æ¶éææçæ¼é³æ¹æ¡ï¼æ ¹æå°æ¥­
> > çè¨è«ãæ°ä¸»ç決å®ï¼éæ廣çæå¶å®ï¼ä¸¦éééé è»ã"
> >
> > Could we produce evidence to support as well? As an appendix?
> >
> > 6) éåæ¹æ¡ä¸ä¸å®æ²æ缺é»ï¼ä¹ä¸ä¸å®ä¸è½ä¿®æ­£ï¼ä½ç¡è«å¦ä½ï¼æåå 
決
> > èªçºåèªææä½ä»»ä½ä¿®æ¹ï¼å¿
é æåºå­¸è¡ä¸ççç±ï¼æ¯å¦ç¶éå¯ä¿¡çèªè¨
> > å­¸ç調æ¥è­æTLPAç缺失ï¼æç±é³é»å­¸å®¶ç¶éå°æ¥­çè¨è«æåºé³é»å­¸ä¸ç
> > çè«æ ¹æï¼æ ¹æ缺é»é²è¡ä¿®æ¹ï¼ç¶å°æ¥­çç ç©¶èè¨è«æ±ºå®ä¿®æ¹ã
> >
> > What kind of survey are we talking about? Can we draft out one
> > proposal to evaluate TLPA? Surely, we know the advantages and
> > disadvantages of TLPA?
> >
> > 7) åå è
æ以ç¶å設è¨æ­¤ä¸æ¹æ¡ä¹å°ç£èªæå­¸æåç¶å¹´æè²é¨æèè«çå°
> > 家學è
åTLPAç使ç¨åé«çºä¸»ï¼èéç±æ¿æ²»ä»»å½çå°æ¸åèªå§å¡ææ票決
> > å®åæ¨ã
> >
> > Is it ok to inferring to certain members? (legally?) I feel that
> > an independent survey is needed to investigate this, instead of
> > the old or the new members. In this way, there will be less
> > chance of having disputes and bias.
> >
> > Hope these are helpful.
> >
> > Usuan
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "æ´ªæä»" 
> > Sent: Tuesday, March 11, 2003 3:27 PM
> > Subject: {SPAM?} å¾µæ±é£ç½²
> >
> >
> > > <<å°ç£èªæå­¸ææéåèªæ欲éæ¬é³æ¨ä¹è²æ.doc>>
> > >
> > > åä½æå¡åéå¿å°èªæåæè²çåæ¹è³¢éï¼
> > >
> > > åèªæ¨è¡æ¨è¡å§å¡ææ°ä»»ä¸»å§ä¸ä»»ä»¥ä¾ï¼
> > > åä½ä¸æ·ï¼å ±è¼ä¸»å§ä¼å以éå­¸è¡ãä¸æ°ä¸»æ段
> > > å·å¤©ææ¥ï¼æTLPAææææç¾
馬å­ã
> > >
> > > å°ç£èªæå­¸æç¼èµ·é£ç½²ï¼è¦æ±æè²é¨åèªæç«å³
> > > æ¸æ¶¯å馬ã
> > >
> > > 謹é件é£ç½²è²ææ¸ä¸ä»½ï¼è¬¹è«åä½æå¡åéå¿
> > > å°èªæåæè²çåæ¹è³¢éåèé£ç½²æ´»åã
> > >
> > > ï¼ï¼Ang Uijin
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
>

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
* Li chu-chheh e e-mail khau-cho si: "Bongpo" .
* Beh kia phoe ho' tak-ke tioh iong chit-e khau-cho chiah kia-e-kau.
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *