"Tojhokchu" hou taigu-bang e phoe:

Ui-bun,
Chin to-sia li e comment.
Li chit-e kong-hoat kap Tenn Bok-su sio-kang.
Choe-kin kia hou li e phe long hong the--tng--lai.
M-chai an-choann?
Babuza

----- Original Message -----
From: ChiuN Uibun 
To: 
Sent: Saturday, March 23, 2002 8:04 PM
Subject: Re: [TGB] POJ e Eng-gi Hoan-ek


> "ChiuN Uibun"  hou taigu-bang e phoe:
>
> Takke CTT!
>
> Goa ko-jin e khoaNhoat si anne:
>
> Ti Lomaji hoat-tian e Au-chiu, eng-ui bo iong Hanji, sou-i in e vernacular
> writing = colloquial writing.
>
> Tan-si ti Hanji bunhoa-khoan, eng-ui bo-gi u kheng-leng iong Hanji
hiatchia
> Lomaji lai sia, sou-i:
> colloquial writing = vernacular writing (colloquial it-teng si vernacular)
> vernacular writing X= colloquial writing (vernacular bo-it-teng si
> colloquial)
>
> Goan-in si eng-ui Hanji si im-chat su-sou (morpho-syllabic) e bunji
> kiat-kau, lomaji si im-sou (phonemic) e kiat-kau. Na iong im-chat su-sou e
> bunji lai su-sia, esai bian kun-ku khau-gi; c.k. koe-khi e bun-gian-bun.
Na
> iong im-sou e bunji lai sia, goan-chek-siong to ai chiau khau-gi lai sia,
na
> bo to e chin oh thak.
> Au-chiu eng-iu chu-iau iong Lomaji, sou-i na kong bo-gi su-sia (vernacular
> writing) esi, it-teng si ki i khau-gi ui ki-chhou e peh-oe su-sia
> (colloquial writing). Mkoh ti Hanji bunhoa-khoan, bo-gi su-sia u kho-leng
m
> si kun-ku khau-gi e. ChhiuNkong hit koa Tong-si, sui-lian etang iong Taigi
> thak, mkoh in msi khau-gi e peh-oe. OaN tnglai khoaN Peh-oe-ji, it-poaN
lai
> kong, iong im-sou bunji POJ sia e it-teng si kun-ku khau-gi e.
>
> Sou-i, "colloquial writing" chit e gisu chu-iau si beh un-iong ti Hanji
> bunhoa-khoan lai ham Hanji cho tui-chiau e khu-piat.
>
> Isiong, chhiaN chi-kau.
>
>
> --Uibun
> @@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@
>
> Taiffalo's Eco-linguistics of Society
> <http://ling.uta.edu/~taiffalo>
>
> Nationalism and Language in Asia
> <http://home.kimo.com.tw/de-han>
>
> @@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Tojhokchu" 
> To: "Henning Kloeter" 
> Cc: "Ui-bun, Chiunn" ; "Robert Cheng"
> ; "Khin-hoann(Havard)1" ;
> "Hok-chu" ; "Ahui 1968" ; "Li
> Heng-chhiong" ; "Sichong"
;
> "Ungian Dahan" ; "'Henry H. Tan-Tenn
>'" 
> Sent: Saturday, March 23, 2002 2:28 PM
> Subject: Fw: [TGB] POJ e Eng-gi Hoan-ek
>
>
> > Henning,
> > Which one do you think is more correct for TOJ/POJ,
> > colloquial writing or vernacular writing?
> > Thanks!
> >
> > According to Tenn Ji-giok Bok-su, a 80 y/o pastor from
> > Tai-lam Sin-hak-inn, colloquial is the correct one.
> > The term was created to be the opposite of Han-ji.
> >
> > What do you say?
> > Regards,
> > Babuza
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: ntttc 
> > To: Tojhokchu ; max5621 ;
> > ; TaiGu-Formosa ;
> > ; ;
;
> > ; 
> > Sent: Friday, March 22, 2002 9:43 AM
> > Subject: [TGB] POJ e Eng-gi Hoan-ek
> >
> >
> > > "ntttc"  hou taigu-bang e phoe:
> > >
> > > ChhiaN-mng POJ e Eng-gi hoan-ek si beh an-choaN sia, goa u khoaN tioh
> lang
> > > iong:
> > >
> > > 1. colloquial writing;
> > >
> > > 2. vernacular writing;
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Hak-khiam
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
>
>
> _________________________________________________________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> 
>
>